I know I'm kind of preaching to the choir here, but we all know the importance of relevant viewers seeing our content

[zihadhasan012]

In the end, from my short-lived, but informative linkbuilding experiences, I've found that the most important bit of organic linkbuilding (especially for those sites that aren't regularly updating or don't have the resources or the ability to put viral content together) is getting relevant viewers to see relevant content. The reason the Pajama's Media link was so awesome was the way in which both articles related to one another; the Spectator's article informed the discussion surrounding the other article.


I know I'm kind of preaching to the choir here, but we all kno israel mobile phone numbers database w the importance of relevant viewers seeing our content. It's what keeps bounce rates low, and it's also what makes users come back. Needless to say, I'm sold on nofollows. That goes for building links on relevant articles like Wikipedia and even Twitter. My goal is to get interested eyeballs to interesting pages—nothing more nothing less. I know that mine wasn't a great sample size, but to put it into context, of the people that came to the article as a direct or indirect result of the nofollow, ~1% made a comment on the article itself, and ~2% blogged about it (although I don't think that my data is universalizable)—actually, if you count this article, then the results were blogged about by 3% of the visitors.


While I don't think that these numbers would hold on a site with more viewers, I think that they represent the way in which content ends up going viral. In the end, ALL IT TAKES IS ONE LINK, and it's follow status doesn't seem to make a difference. This past week at SES San Jose 2009 gave me the most mixed emotions of any conference I've attended yet. There were parts I loved and parts I was disappointed in.